How to Plagiarise Like a Pro.
Titty Pervert 116 views
Stumbled upon a blog post and noticed that whole bloody post was lifted up from a book called Freakonomics. Freakonomics is a clever book, I have nothing against people plagiarising it. What I’m against though, are people who plagiarise but does it like a fucking tard.
And this skinny chink does exactly that. The skinny tard lifted half a page from Freakonomics and passed it off as his own insightful view on economics. Thus passing himself off as clever, since Freakonomics is a clever book. Well, not quite!
Skinny tard committed multiple of mistakes while copying an excerpt from the book. Here are the common mistakes of a failed plagiariser:
1. COPYING FROM A BESTSELLER
Possibly the stupidest thing to do. Freakonomics is a world’s bestseller, peaking at no. 2 on the New York Times Bestseller List. Copying from a bestseller is a dead giveaway to your inability to write original articles or find inconspicuous articles to copy. This will not go down well if you have intended to sound and look like a smart person. Not to say that the skinny, long yellow face did not divulge much about your intelligence but plagiarising a bestseller certainly has confirmed your lack of it.
2. USING THE SAME CONTEXT
When plagiarising, always change the context of the original article. In this case, the tard has resorted to using the original context of Freakonomics in his plagiarised post - blood donations.
This offence is anticipated from a failed plagiariser, because unlike smart plagiarisers (myself included) who are doing it for sheer convenience and laziness, failed plagiarisers plagiarise simply due to their lack of originality. He could have simply changed blood donations to sperm donations, RM30 to Indon hookers and RM3000 to Czech hookers.
Consider these changes to the pariah plagiarised post (in bold):
In lack of blood donors, so there’s this sperm donation agency who came up with a new idea, a new kind of sperm donations campaign which they pay you an Indon hooker for each donation, hoping to attract more donors, it was the conventional wisdom which they thought they can simply attract donors with an exchange of sexual favours.
So the campaign starts running, after the first week they found that the amount of sperm donors has not increased, people tend to donate less sperm, eventually, the campaign failed to meet it’s objective to attract more donors.
But why?
Now ask yourself, why would you participate in sperm donation campaigns, surely not for the KFCs, nor the Malta energy drink they provide you after the donation, you simply donate your sperm for charity, that’s your motivation as a sperm donor, so if said now they are paying you Indon hooker for your sperm, the whole process would have turn a noble charity act into a sleazy way of getting a lousy orgasm, so that’s not a worth.
So now you think, the campaign has raised the stipend from Indon hooker to let’s say, Chinese hooker, or Czech hooker, surely the number of sperm donors would seem to rise dramatically.
Sweet, however, if that pint of your sperm would have the price of Czech hooker, then expect something else to rise dramatically also besides the number of sperm donors, the rates of sexually transmitted diseases, people would steal your sperm, simply with a knife or they might just cut off other people’s penises to circumvent donation limits.
Fucking hell better, no?
3. CLAIMED TO HAVE READ THE BESTSELLER
Last but not least, the dumbest thing a plagiariser can do is to claim to have read the source of his plagiarism. There’s an About Me section of the skinny tard’s blog where he wrote that he enjoys reading among others, Freakonomics. If he had not claimed to have read the book, he could have still bullshit his way through by saying it’s merely a sheer coincidence. Heck, he could even retaliate with an overused line such as “Great minds think alike”.
4. RETALIATE WITH A LAME COMEBACK.
If you’ve noticed the comment section of the plagiarised post, skinny tard’s plagiarism was exposed by a reader and his reply to the reader?
kimberlycun said… 2:50 PM
nice rip-off from the book, Freakonomics.
how about writing your own ideas, sam?
Wannabe Economist said… 6:00 PM
I’ll call that a mash-up instead =)
Mash-up? More like a complete messed-up, idiot.
Tags: ching chong, chink, dumbass, freakonomics, horse face, long face, plagiarism, skinny, skinny tard, stupid, ugly, yellow faceTittyPervert @ October 8, 2007
lmao, pwn!
We rest our case. Rofl. pwned.
Eh, next book i’ll rip would be one of the disney classics methinks. Im sure if i call my main character Baloo no one will know.
Oops, sorry, I had that entry removed, and I’ll state and apology later. I didn’t know it will be that serious anyway. Sorry for the offend..
[…] In the spirit of following through with what I’ve started, here’s a blatant and explicit attack on the skinny tard that I’ve taunted here. […]